Tip Off isn't a bad book, but it's hard to get excited about. In fact, a one-word review would simply be "meh". Filip Bondy presents us with the equivalent of watching a player take a 17' jump shot when he could have dunked on three guys - it's just as effective and may even be the right play, but leaves the audience slightly underwhelmed.
This is a shame, because Bondy chose a fascinating topic: the 1984 NBA draft, which saw Michael Jordan, Hakeem Olajuwon, Sam Perkins, Charles Barkley and John Stockton arrive in professional basketball. It also provided the backdrop for the most high-profile draft blunder in history, when Portland selected Kentucky center Sam Bowie instead of Jordan with the second overall pick.
It's a succinct read which touches on the leadup to the draft, what each team was thinking when making their selections and also a brief look at how each player fared. There's little coming together of the players - of every player drafted, the book may as well be about the six guys listed above. Nobody - well, nobody except the most hardened basketball-philes - wants to know Chicago's thinking behind taking NBL legend Butch Hays with a seventh-round pick, or the reasons that Indiana chose Charlotte legend Stuart Gray.
Bondy writes to get the facts out rather than to entertain. It is well-researched and the author has obviously researched and interviewed broadly, which all serves a purpose but at times upsets the book's flow. Each chapter focuses on one aspect of the draft process, be it Chicago or Houston allegedly tanking (leading to the institution of the draft lottery in 1985), the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics or Sam Perkins' background in upstate New York. The result is that there are minimal shared experiences which takes away from the Draft's inherent maturation storyline.
The information is all there, but given the storied nature of that draft, the reader is left feeling as if they're in some way short changed and that perhaps a writer with a greater sense of the event may have made Tip Off more enjoyable. As it is, it's intriguing at times (did you know that Philadelphia offered Dr. J or Andrew Toney and the no. 5 pick for the no. 3 pick so they could take Jordan?) but labours with an invasive flatness.
A perfectly average read - making it tennis balls.
Showing posts with label sports writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sports writing. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Monday, July 2, 2012
Review: Over Time - Frank Deford
| courtesy: livetalksla.or |
Frank Deford talks of his work Over
Time not as a memoir but a we-moir, a collation of transient
connections with figures more famous than himself. When asked to
write a piece for alma mater Sports Illustrated about his
early days at the United States' foremost sports magazine, he
initially resisted; but as it became obvious there was a desire for a
Mad Men style homage to the golden age of US magazines, no-one
was in a better position to detail those salad days of the sixties.
Were you to boil down Deford's style to
a single adjective, it would be wry. He is observant yet economical,
distilling major events and people into their vital alchemy and
transmitting what he absorbs with a pleasant mix of good humour and
gravitas. He has used the same affable style for fifty years,
through books, editorials and myriad essays; the result is
four-hundred-odd pages of brilliant simple statements. In fact,
Deford writes with vision and simplicity that makes readers often
think “Why didn't I see it that way before?”
This geniality is only magnfied by an
attitude of supreme moderation. Deford is a sporting centreist –
as he proves
with his weekly NPR commentaries – well aware of the unique
position sport occupies in our cultural landscape. At a recent
speech at the Seattle Public Library, he suggested both the import
and triviality of sport by announcing the only two unnecessary
cultural phenomena developed individually by every people have been
sport and religion.
Acutely aware of his position as an
observer rather than newsmaker, he presents his life journey quite
superficially and bases his experiences around those in public life
who were attracting the same attention. Where he writes about
personal matters, it is almost entirely in regard to his artisanship,
or concerning the athletes were the root source of his material and
observations. A perfect example comes from one of the work's final
chapters where he talks with shark Jimmy the Greek about their shared
loss – children lost to Cystic Fibrosis.
This isn't your typical me-me-me book,
detailing “my struggle against the odds” or a list of
accomplishments made more impressive when taken out of context.
Deford freely admits to benefiting from luck and the era in which he
got his start. His writing is about his profession, rather than
himself and as such you find yourself knowing less of the man than
you would choose; no doubt Deford prefers this way. He revels in
what he has seen throughout his career, being able to witness the
triumph and despair that's inherent at any sport; at the same time
however the career is obviously only part of the man.
However, because his scope spans five
decades, he really does no more than touch upon so many of the topics
that could conceivably sell Over Time: these are anecdotes of
his time observing sport, rather than his opinions. The stories are
personal and not hearsay; a particular example being when he caught a
train with a young Muhammad Ali and found him searching for spiritual
and emotional understanding, exploring that which would make him
controversial. In this manner, his writing on Arthur Ashe is sad but
upbeat and the reader absorbs Deford's patent respect for the great
tennis player.
As a text for aspiring sportswriters it
has no definite teaching points, or at least very few. Deford's lack
of personal conceit contributes to this somewhat; his belief is that
writing is something you can or can't do, something rarely learned
well. This seems partially a cover for such a humble man about whom
his craft agrees that he is the patrician.
While there are few absolute
commandments, the aspiring blogosphere would do well to heed his
obvious breadth of vision. The value of a broad intake of news and
views is tacitly suggested, as being well-rounded provides writers
with the ability to place sport and the context from which stories
emerge into a more global spectrum.
It's a wonderful piece of writing. But
from Frank Deford, would you expect anything else?
Footballs.
Suggested other reviews:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
